How Many YouTube Channels Have Over 100 Million Subscribers?

Everyone knows MrBeast is the biggest channel on YouTube. Far fewer people can name the second, and almost nobody can say how many channels have crossed a hundred million subscribers at all.

How many YouTube channels have over 100 million subscribers? The answer is smaller than you'd guess.

This is a count of the Influesque creator index, 41,018 unique channels across 28 countries and 22 niches. There's an honesty note about what that means, which comes before the tables.

How Many YouTube Channels Have Over 100 Million Subscribers?

Seventeen. Here they are.

Two things jump out. MrBeast is 62% larger than the next channel. That gap is wider than the one between second and eighth. And five of the seventeen are Indian media companies or music labels rather than individual creators.

The children's-content cluster is the other pattern. Cocomelon, Vlad and Niki, Kids Diana Show, Like Nastya. Four of the top nine, and all of them make content watched on repeat by an audience with no purchasing power at all.

How the Tiers Thin Out

Each step down multiplies the pool, but not evenly.

I want to be straight about that last column, because most statistics pages like this one aren't.

Our index holds the top 100 channels per country and niche. At 100 million subscribers that's effectively a census. A channel that size can't fail to rank top-100 somewhere, so the index won't miss it. At 50 million the same logic mostly holds.

Below that it breaks down. There are certainly more than 8,776 channels on YouTube with a million subscribers. Our index simply isn't built to count them, because a million-subscriber channel can easily sit outside the top 100 of a competitive category. So read the top two rows as counts and the bottom two as floors.

Which Niches Produce Giant Channels?

Among channels above 10 million subscribers, the distribution is heavily skewed.

Comedy produces nearly twice as many giant channels as music and almost three times as many as gaming. All three travel across languages. You don't need English to enjoy a stunt, a song, or a game.

Here's the reality that follows: the categories that scale largest are the ones that pay least per view. Comedy carries a $13 CPM in our pricing model. Finance carries $60. The audiences that grow to a hundred million are broad, young and cheap to reach, which is precisely why advertisers pay less for them.

Does Any of This Matter for Sponsorships?

Honestly, not much, and that's the useful conclusion.

Subscriber count records everyone who ever clicked subscribe, including people who stopped watching in 2019. The share who still watch a given video falls hard as channels grow.

What you pay for is average views. Two channels with identical badges can differ several times over on delivery.

I'm going to be blunt here: leaderboard content like this is fun to read and nearly useless for buying media.

If you're shopping at this end of the market anyway, the median channel above 10 million commands roughly $93,000 for a standard integration in our data, with the middle half running about $35,000 to $228,000. Model a specific one on the sponsorship calculator.

For nearly every brand the interesting question isn't who's biggest. It's who delivers the most relevant views per dollar, and that's almost never a hundred-million-subscriber channel.

If you want the affordable end instead, start with how to find nano influencers on YouTube or browse the top channels by country and niche.

👉 Find Creators Now and search by average views instead of subscriber count.

What the List Tells You About YouTube

A few patterns worth pulling out, because the composition says more than the ranking does.

Kids' content is enormously over-represented. Four of the top nine make content for young children. Toddlers rewatch, don't skip and don't churn. Those are the three behaviors the algorithm rewards most, which makes kids' content the closest thing YouTube has to guaranteed retention.

India accounts for five of the seventeen. T-Series, SET India, Zee Music, Goldmines and Sony SAB are media companies rather than individual creators. Scale here comes from back-catalog volume and a very large domestic audience, not from a personality.

Only a handful are what most people mean by "a YouTuber." MrBeast, PewDiePie, Stokes Twins, Alan's Universe. The rest are media businesses, music labels, or children's studios.

Nobody in finance, tech or business appears at all. The highest-CPM categories top out far below this tier, because those audiences stay narrow by definition. A channel about tax planning won't ever reach a hundred million people.

That last point is worth carrying into a media plan. The categories where sponsorships pay best can't produce the biggest channels, and the biggest channels sit where advertisers pay least.

Final Takeaway

Seventeen channels have passed a hundred million subscribers, and one of them is 62% bigger than the runner-up.

Below that the pool widens fast: 102 above 50 million, then over a thousand above 10 million. The categories producing those giants are comedy, music and gaming, all of which travel across languages and all of which carry low advertising rates precisely because their audiences are so broad.

Which is the part worth remembering if you're buying rather than browsing: the biggest channels are the cheapest per view and the least targeted. Subscriber count is a leaderboard metric, not a media-buying one.

Bottom line: interesting to know, rarely useful to act on.

If you want the tier that actually converts, read how to find nano influencers on YouTube or how to find gaming YouTubers by budget.

Where the Useful Numbers Actually Are

If you came here for a media decision rather than trivia, the interesting tiers sit far below this page.

A channel with 50,000 subscribers and 30,000 average views costs a few hundred dollars for an integration. A channel with 100 million costs six figures and reaches an audience defined only by "people who like watching things."

The gap in targeting is enormous. At the small end you can pick a creator whose entire audience matches your customer. At the top you're buying a broadcast slot. Better production, far less precision.

There's also availability. Seventeen channels sit above 100 million subscribers. All seventeen have agencies, waiting lists and rate cards you won't negotiate.

Below a hundred thousand subscribers there are tens of thousands of creators. Most have never been approached by a brand at all.

One of those groups is competitive. The other is wide open.

Browse the largest names on top comedy channels, then open the platform to filter for the sizes you can actually book.

That asymmetry is the whole argument for shopping small. The seventeen names above are the ones everyone already knows, which is precisely why they cost what they cost, and why the creator who converts best for you is almost certainly someone you've never heard of.

Frequently Asked Questions